Case Study 3: Cate
Cate, a 13-year-old school squash player, trains 4 times a week. Her normal food
intake maintains her weight at 41kg. Recently, a McDonald’s fast food restaurant opens near her home. After her squash training, Cate now has a daily routine in which she will consume an upsize (bigger portion) meal for lunch, consisting of a main course, fries, and a drink. She chooses not to have the same main course within the same week. The rest of her diet remains unchanged.
1. What is the effect of this diet on Cate’s weight after two months? Will this
effect carry on and on? Explain.
2. Companies sometimes tempt the consumers by offering a bigger portion
meal at a very low price. However the consumer might not necessarily need the bigger portion meal but will still end up buying it as it is more value for money. Explore the difference in the effect on Cate’s diet between a standard and an upsize meal over the same duration as in Q1.
3. Subway has been touted as a “healthier” choice, as compared to
McDonalds’, for those who are more health conscious. Suppose Cate is now having Subway for lunch after her squash training instead of McDonalds’, establish if this diet is indeed “healthier”. Her Subway meal should consist of a 6-inch sandwich, a cookie, and a drink. She chooses not to have the same sandwich within the same week. Questions to consider:
This are our Maths Modeling Qn:)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment