Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Case Study


Case Study 3: Cate

Cate, a 13-year-old school squash player, trains 4 times a week. Her normal food 
intake maintains her weight at 41kg. Recently, a McDonald’s fast food restaurant
 opens near her home. After her squash training, Cate now has a daily routine in 
which she will consume an upsize (bigger portion) meal for lunch, consisting of a 
main course, fries, and a drink. She chooses not to have the same main course 
within the same week. The rest of her diet remains unchanged.

1.  What is the effect of this diet on Cate’s weight after two months? Will this
effect carry on and on? Explain.
2.  Companies sometimes tempt the consumers by offering a bigger portion 
meal at a very low price. However the consumer might not necessarily need 
the bigger portion meal but will still end up buying it as it is more value for 
money. Explore the difference in the effect on Cate’s diet between a 
standard and an upsize meal over the same duration as in Q1.
3.  Subway has been touted as a “healthier” choice, as compared to 
McDonalds’, for those who are more health conscious. Suppose Cate is now 
having Subway for lunch after her squash training instead of McDonalds’, 
establish if this diet is indeed “healthier”.  Her Subway meal should consist 
of a 6-inch sandwich, a cookie, and a drink. She chooses not to have the 
same sandwich within the same week.

Questions to consider:
  • What does it mean by "healthy" food?
  • What causes weight gain?
  • What is the relationship between calories intake and weight gain?
  • What is "activity factor"?
  • How does "activity factor" affect the amount of calories required by a person?
  • What necessary assumptions do you have to make?
  • What are the relevant variables?

This are our Maths Modeling Qn:)

No comments:

Post a Comment